Create Task Sample I Grading
Sample: I Row 1: 1
Row 2: 0
Row 3: 0
Row 4: 1
Row 5: 1
Row 6: 0
Row 7: 0
Row 8: 0
Row 1:
The response earned the point for this row.
The video illustrates the program running, and the response states the purpose of the program as shown in the video.
Row 2:
The response did not earn the point for this row.
The response does not describe the overall interactive or iterative development of the entire program.
Row 3:
The response did not earn the point for this row.
The response states that “One main problem was to learn how to get the app to display in the countdown slot…” However, this is not a problem or opportunity during the program development process, it’s a design issue. The second difficulty and its resolution are given.
Row 4:
The response earned the point for this row.
The selected block of code represents an algorithm.
The response earned the point for this row.
The circled code contains math/logic. The response explains how the algorithm works in detail. The response describes what this algorithm does in relation to the program: “Both algorithms are essential because in unison they allow the program to work” AND then states what would happen to the program if either part is missing. By explaining what happens if each part is missing, the response is explaining what these algorithms do for the whole program.
Row 6:
The response did not earn the point for this row.
The response identifies two algorithms, one of which is inside the other. There is no additional algorithm identified.
Row 7:
The response did not earn the point for this row.
The boxed code fragment does not represent an abstraction.
Row 8:
The response did not earn the point for this row.
The response does not explain how the boxed code manages complexity in the program. The response merely states how the code fragment works.
